<slide title="NuSOAP">
<list title="The good parts">
<bullet>SOAP 1.1</bullet>
<bullet>Interoperability testing done with all major implementations</bullet>
<bullet>Script based Client and Server</bullet>
<bullet>RPC/Encoded and Document/Literal</bullet>
<bullet>HTTP, HTTPS, able to add other transports</bullet>
<bullet>Supports 1999/2001 Schema</bullet>
<bullet>WSDL Generation/Support</bullet>
<bullet>Not part of PEAR (good/bad?)</bullet>
<bullet>Better Schema support than PEAR::SOAP (?)</bullet>
<bullet>XML de/serialization more optimized than PEAR::SOAP</bullet>
</list>
<list title="The bad parts">
<bullet>SOAP 1.2 support not finished (?)</bullet>
<bullet>No Attachment support (?)</bullet>
<bullet>Probably not good for long running processes</bullet>
<bullet>PHP 4 Object support</bullet>
<bullet>No streaming XML pull parser</bullet>
<bullet>Written entirely in script</bullet>
</list>
</slide>
